Pedro De Angelis asserted that Juan Baptista lied about being Tupac Amaru’s family to get a lifelong pension from Buenos Aires.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse

To determine whether the statement about Pedro De Angelis' assertion that Juan Baptista lied about being Tupac Amaru's family to obtain a lifelong pension from Buenos Aires is True or False, we need to consider historical context and the credibility of the claim.

Pedro De Angelis was a historical figure known for documenting aspects of Argentine history, including the Tupac Amaru uprising. Juan Baptista’s claim of familial ties to Tupac Amaru is contested in historical records. The assertion made by De Angelis implies a questioning of Baptista's integrity and motives regarding the pension.

Research into primary sources or reputable historical analyses that discuss this claim will support our evaluation. However, without specific documents or evidence, one cannot definitively conclude whether De Angelis's assertion is a fact or merely a perspective.

In conclusion, based on the historical context, the statement is likely True, as it aligns with documented skepticism regarding Juan Baptista's claims. However, further investigation into historical records would be necessary for an authoritative determination.