In a sequential game, a firm will always want to be the leader to take advantage of the first-mover advantage.Group of answer choices
Question
In a sequential game, a firm will always want to be the leader to take advantage of the first-mover advantage.
Group of answer choices:
Solution
This statement is generally true but not always. In a sequential game, being the first mover or leader can provide significant advantages. This is known as the first-mover advantage. The first-mover can set prices, establish a strong brand, and gain customer loyalty before competitors enter the market.
However, there can also be disadvantages to being the first mover. For example, the first mover may have to bear high research and development costs, and there is a risk that later entrants will improve on the first mover's product or service. Therefore, whether a firm will always want to be the leader in a sequential game depends on the specific circumstances.
Similar Questions
In a sequential game, the firm which is the first to enter a new market will certainly have a first mover advantage.
If a firm finds it most profitable to adopt the same strategy regardless what its rival chooses to do, then that firm has a dominant strategy
The payoff value for which each player in a game always selects the same strategy is called the
Second movers always do better than leaders because they can free-ride off the first-mover’s investment.
In economics, a game is always a prisoners’ dilemma.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.