The impact of Furman v. Georgia (1972) was that states had to A. promise to use the death penalty only with approval from the Supreme Court. B. throw out the old Miranda warning and write a new one. C. agree to throw out all state laws regarding crime and impose national standards. D. create clear standards to be applied fairly before imposing the death penalty.

Step 1: Define the Problem

Identify the key components of the question: Determine the impact of the Furman v. Georgia (1972) decision on state laws regarding the death penalty.

Step 2: Break Down the Problem

Analyze each option to see which one aligns with the decision made in Furman v. Georgia:

• Option A: States needing Supreme Court approval for the death penalty.
• Option B: Changes to the Miranda warning.
• Option C: Imposing national standards over state laws.
• Option D: Creating clear standards for applying the death penalty.

Step 3: Apply Relevant Concepts

Furman v. Georgia (1972) was a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed the arbitrary and inconsistent imposition of the death penalty, which was deemed unconstitutional under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Step 4: Analysis, Verify and Summarize

• Option A is incorrect because the decision did not require Supreme Court approval for each death penalty case.
• Option B is unrelated to the case, as it pertains to Miranda rights, not the death penalty.
• Option C is incorrect because the decision did not impose national standards over state laws.
• Option D is correct because the ruling required states to create clear and consistent standards for imposing the death penalty to avoid arbitrary sentencing.

Final Answer

D. create clear standards to be applied fairly before imposing the death penalty.