In "A Vindication of the Rights of Woman," Wollstonecraft contrasts her logic and reasoning with:

In "A Vindication of the Rights of Woman," Mary Wollstonecraft contrasts her logic and reasoning with the prevailing societal norms and attitudes of her time, specifically those championed by male philosophers and educators who argued for the inferiority of women. She critiques the commonly accepted notions of female roles and virtues, which valued submission and obedience over rationality and independence.

1. Contrast with Male Philosophers: Wollstonecraft counters the philosophical ideas of prominent thinkers like Rousseau and Locke, who upheld the idea that women should be confined to domestic roles based on perceived natural differences between genders. She argues that these ideas are rooted in custom rather than reason.

2. Emotional vs. Rational Approaches: She highlights the traditional expectation that women should be emotional and nurturing, contrasting this with her belief in the capability of women to engage in rational thought and public life.

3. Education and Enlightenment: Wollstonecraft advocates for education as a means to equip women with the tools for reasoned thought and independence, standing against the belief that women did not require intellectual development.

4. Call for Equality: Her reasoning emphasizes that moral and intellectual development is essential for all individuals, regardless of gender, which sets her apart from the conventional wisdom of her contemporaries.

Through these contrasts, Wollstonecraft lays the groundwork for her argument advocating for women's rights and gender equality, making a compelling case that societal change is necessary for true progress.