Assertion (A): Democracies do not appear to be very successful in reducingeconomic inequalities.Reason(R): The majority of Indian voters are poor.

Step 1: Understand the assertion and reason: The assertion states that democracies are not successful in reducing economic inequalities. The reason given for this is that the majority of Indian voters are poor.

Step 2: Analyze the assertion: The assertion suggests that democracies, as a form of government, are not effective in reducing economic inequalities. It implies that despite being a democracy, economic inequalities persist.

Step 3: Evaluate the reason: The reason provided is that the majority of Indian voters are poor. This implies that if the majority of voters are poor, they may not have the power or influence to bring about significant changes in reducing economic inequalities.

Step 4: Assess the relationship between the assertion and reason: The reason given does not directly support the assertion. While it is true that the majority of Indian voters may be poor, it does not necessarily mean that democracies are unsuccessful in reducing economic inequalities. There could be other factors at play.

Step 5: Formulate a response: The assertion and reason provided do not establish a strong cause-and-effect relationship. While it is important to consider the socio-economic conditions of the majority of voters, it is not sufficient to conclude that democracies are unsuccessful in reducing economic inequalities. Other factors such as government policies, implementation, and external influences also play a significant role in addressing economic inequalities.