Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

McLaughlin (1987, p. 56) argued that Krashen’s term is full of precision and clarity. Select the correct option True False

Question

McLaughlin (1987, p. 56) argued that Krashen’s term is full of precision and clarity.

Select the correct option

  • True
  • False
🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

The statement is asking whether McLaughlin’s (1987) assertion regarding Krashen’s term reflects “full precision and clarity” is true or false.

To answer this question, we must examine the context of Krashen's theories, especially concerning language acquisition, and McLaughlin's analysis of them. If McLaughlin indeed stated that Krashen’s term is characterized by full precision and clarity, then the correct option would be True. On the other hand, if the statement implied that McLaughlin criticized Krashen's term lacking these qualities, the correct option would be False.

Given the information presented, without additional context, the assumed correct option must be checked against McLaughlin's evaluation. However, as per the question posed without further details on McLaughlin's interpretation, we would tentatively select False, as critiques of Krashen's theories often arise in academic discourse.

Final Answer: False (assuming a common critical stance on Krashen's clarity).

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

From the given options choose the one which is the closest in meaning to the word given below CLEAR

Find out that word, the spelling of which is WRONG.Choices:- Formulate Formidable Forman Format

Discuss what is meant by the statement: “There is a trade-off betweenprecision and confidence under certain conditions.”

True or False: We are being vague when we answer questions with ambiguous language.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse

In the text, I argued that Aquinas's Argument is invalid because it contradicts science.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse

1/1

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.