Rejection of higher universal or common moral standards is one of the problems of CERQuestion 10AnswerTrueFalse

Step 1: Break Down the Problem

The statement is evaluating whether the rejection of higher universal or common moral standards is a problem within the context of Cultural Ethical Relativism (CER). We need to determine if this assertion is true or false by examining the principles of CER.

Step 2: Relevant Concepts

Cultural Ethical Relativism posits that moral standards are not universal and instead are culturally bound. As such, what is considered "moral" can vary significantly across different societies. A rejection of universal moral standards implies that moral judgments are relative to cultural contexts, which is a fundamental concept in CER.

Step 3: Analysis and Detail

1. Understanding CER: CER suggests that ethical values are given context by cultural norms. If higher universal moral standards are rejected, this aligns with CER's viewpoint that morality is subjective.

2. Implications of Rejection: The rejection of universal moral standards leads to challenges, such as:

   • Lack of common ground in resolving moral disputes.
   • Potential justification for harmful practices under the guise of cultural differences.

3. Conclusion on the Statement: Since CER fundamentally rejects the idea of higher universal morals, the assertion that this rejection is a problem may be viewed as true from a moral discourse perspective.

Step 4: Verify and Summarize

The core of the question aligns with the principles of Cultural Ethical Relativism. High universal or common moral standards are indeed rejected within this framework, which can be problematic when considering objective ethics.

Final Answer

True. The rejection of higher universal or common moral standards is considered a problem within the framework of Cultural Ethical Relativism.