43. Which of these types of listening lacks depth?*Appreciative listeningSuperficial listeningFocused listeningEvaluative listening

Step 1: Break Down the Problem

The question asks to identify a type of listening that lacks depth. The options provided are:

1. Appreciative listening
2. Superficial listening
3. Focused listening
4. Evaluative listening

Step 2: Relevant Concepts

To answer this question, we need to understand the definitions of each type of listening:

1. Appreciative Listening: Listening for enjoyment or pleasure (e.g., music).
2. Superficial Listening: Listening without attention to depth or meaning; often passive.
3. Focused Listening: Listening that requires concentration and attention to detail.
4. Evaluative Listening: Listening to assess or judge the content.

Step 3: Analysis and Detail

• Appreciative Listening: While it may not seek depth in terms of analysis, it is focused on enjoying the experience.
• Superficial Listening: This involves a lack of attention and depth, as the listener may not engage with the content meaningfully.
• Focused Listening: This requires attention and is depth-oriented, as the listener seeks to understand deeply.
• Evaluative Listening: Involves critical thinking and assessment, which also implies depth.

Step 4: Verify and Summarize

Given the definitions and characteristics of each listening type, Superficial Listening clearly stands out as the one that lacks depth because it does not engage in meaningful analysis or understanding.

Final Answer

The type of listening that lacks depth is Superficial Listening.