The author of Acts is clearly not an eyewitness of much of what he writes about.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse
Question
The author of Acts is clearly not an eyewitness of much of what he writes about.
Group of answer choices
- True
- False
Solution
This statement is a matter of scholarly debate among biblical historians and theologians.
Common Interpretation:
- Some scholars argue that the author of the Acts of the Apostles, traditionally believed to be Luke, was not an eyewitness to many events described in the text, suggesting that he compiled stories from other sources or second-hand accounts.
- Others maintain that Luke may have been a companion of Paul and thus had access to firsthand accounts, though he may not have witnessed all the events himself.
Given this context, opinions on whether the statement is true or false vary depending on the scholarly perspective.
Final Answer
True (as many scholars argue) or False (according to traditional beliefs about Luke’s connection).
Similar Questions
The book of Acts is the second volume written by Luke.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse
We are nonetheless accountable for our own acts, despite any outside forces that might try to persuade us otherwise.Group of answer choicesTRUENONEFALSE
What evidence does the author use to make her argument? Include examples with proper quotation and citation.
The diary has a frankness that is unlike writing done for publication.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse
It can be inferred from the passage that to gain a more accurate view of a nation’s history and culture, scholars should do all of the following EXCEPT
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.