### Answering the Question

The statement "To describe a solid in geometry, it suffices to have two dimensions" is **B. False**.

### Explanation

1. **Understanding Dimensions**: In geometry, a solid is a three-dimensional figure. Solids have length, width, and height (or depth), unlike two-dimensional shapes which only have length and width.

2. **Examples of Solids**: Common examples of solids include cubes, spheres, cylinders, and pyramids. Each of these requires three dimensions to be fully described.

3. **Implications**: Therefore, stating that two dimensions are sufficient to describe a solid is incorrect. The third dimension is crucial for understanding the volume and overall structure of the solid.

In conclusion, a complete geometric representation of a solid indeed requires three dimensions, making the statement false.

Question

### Answering the Question

The statement "To describe a solid in geometry, it suffices to have two dimensions" is **B. False**.

### Explanation

1. **Understanding Dimensions**: In geometry, a solid is a three-dimensional figure. Solids have length, width, and height (or depth), unlike two-dimensional shapes which only have length and width.

2. **Examples of Solids**: Common examples of solids include cubes, spheres, cylinders, and pyramids. Each of these requires three dimensions to be fully described.

3. **Implications**: Therefore, stating that two dimensions are sufficient to describe a solid is incorrect. The third dimension is crucial for understanding the volume and overall structure of the solid.

In conclusion, a complete geometric representation of a solid indeed requires three dimensions, making the statement false.

Knowee AI · Accepted Answer

### Answering the Question

The statement "To describe a solid in geometry, it suffices to have two dimensions" is **B. False**.

### Explanation

1. **Understanding Dimensions**: In geometry, a solid is a three-dimensional figure. Solids have length, width, and height (or depth), unlike two-dimensional shapes which only have length and width.

2. **Examples of Solids**: Common examples of solids include cubes, spheres, cylinders, and pyramids. Each of these requires three dimensions to be fully described.

3. **Implications**: Therefore, stating that two dimensions are sufficient to describe a solid is incorrect. The third dimension is crucial for understanding the volume and overall structure of the solid.

In conclusion, a complete geometric representation of a solid indeed requires three dimensions, making the statement false.

To describe a solid in geometry, it suffices to have two dimensions.A.TrueB.False

Question

To describe a solid in geometry, it suffices to have two dimensions.

Solution

Answering the Question

Explanation

Similar Questions

Upgrade your grade with Knowee