The 3/5ths compromise suggested that enslaved people were less than human.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse

The statement about the 3/5ths Compromise suggests that enslaved people were viewed as less than human is essentially true.

Explanation:

1. Historical Context: The 3/5ths Compromise was established during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in the United States. It determined that for purposes of representation and taxation, enslaved individuals would be counted as three-fifths of a person.

2. Implication: This compromise was indicative of the attitudes of the time, where enslaved people were dehumanized and seen as property rather than full human citizens. The compromise allowed Southern states to gain more political power by counting enslaved individuals for legislative representation while providing an unjust valuation of their humanity.

3. Conclusion: Therefore, the statement is indeed true; the 3/5ths Compromise reflected a calculation that classified enslaved individuals as less than a whole person, reinforcing the notion that they were viewed as inferior.

Final Answer

True. The 3/5ths Compromise suggested that enslaved people were less than human.