different cities or regions have responded to so-called ‘sharing’ economy platforms with contrasting public or regulatory approaches.

Sharing economy platforms, like Uber or Airbnb, have been met with different reactions in different cities or regions. Some places have embraced these platforms, while others have put regulations in place to control them.

For example, in some cities, Uber has been welcomed as a new and convenient way to get around. These cities see Uber as a positive addition to their transportation options and have allowed the company to operate with few restrictions.

On the other hand, some cities have been more cautious about allowing Uber to operate. They have put regulations in place to control how and where Uber can operate. These cities might require Uber drivers to have a special license, or they might limit the number of Uber cars that can be on the road at any given time.

Similarly, Airbnb has been met with different reactions. Some cities see Airbnb as a good way to boost tourism and provide more lodging options for visitors. These cities might have few restrictions on Airbnb rentals.

However, other cities have put regulations in place to control Airbnb rentals. They might limit the number of days a home can be rented out on Airbnb, or they might require Airbnb hosts to pay a special tax.

So, different cities or regions have responded to sharing economy platforms in different ways, depending on their specific needs, concerns, and perspectives.