This phrase is related to the legal standards that police officers must meet in order to justify a stop, typically of a vehicle or a pedestrian. Here's a step-by-step breakdown:

1. "Specific and articulable facts": This means that the officer must have concrete, clear facts that can be expressed and explained. These cannot be vague hunches or unsupported suspicions. For example, if an officer sees a car swerving erratically, that is a specific and articulable fact.

2. "To support the decision to make a stop": This means that these facts must be relevant and significant enough to justify the stop. The officer must be able to show that the facts led them to reasonably suspect that a law was being broken. Using the previous example, the erratic swerving could suggest that the driver is under the influence, which is a violation of the law.

3. "Facts may be taken together with rational

Question

This phrase is related to the legal standards that police officers must meet in order to justify a stop, typically of a vehicle or a pedestrian. Here's a step-by-step breakdown:

1. "Specific and articulable facts": This means that the officer must have concrete, clear facts that can be expressed and explained. These cannot be vague hunches or unsupported suspicions. For example, if an officer sees a car swerving erratically, that is a specific and articulable fact.

2. "To support the decision to make a stop": This means that these facts must be relevant and significant enough to justify the stop. The officer must be able to show that the facts led them to reasonably suspect that a law was being broken. Using the previous example, the erratic swerving could suggest that the driver is under the influence, which is a violation of the law.

3. "Facts may be taken together with rational

Knowee AI · Accepted Answer

This phrase is related to the legal standards that police officers must meet in order to justify a stop, typically of a vehicle or a pedestrian. Here's a step-by-step breakdown:

1. "Specific and articulable facts": This means that the officer must have concrete, clear facts that can be expressed and explained. These cannot be vague hunches or unsupported suspicions. For example, if an officer sees a car swerving erratically, that is a specific and articulable fact.

2. "To support the decision to make a stop": This means that these facts must be relevant and significant enough to justify the stop. The officer must be able to show that the facts led them to reasonably suspect that a law was being broken. Using the previous example, the erratic swerving could suggest that the driver is under the influence, which is a violation of the law.

3. "Facts may be taken together with rational

An officer must have "specific and articulable facts" to support the decision to make a stop, but facts may be "take together with rational inferences means:

Question

An officer must have "specific and articulable facts" to support the decision to make a stop, but facts may be "take together with rational inferences means:

Solution

Similar Questions

Upgrade your grade with Knowee