Which of the following is NOT a consequence of group cohesiveness?Enhanced job satisfactionIncreased groupthinkImproved group performanceReduced group conflict

To answer this question, let's analyze the consequences of group cohesiveness:

1. Enhanced Job Satisfaction: Group cohesiveness often leads to increased interpersonal connections among team members, which can result in Higher job satisfaction. When people feel connected to their group, they are more likely to enjoy their work and experience a positive work environment.

2. Increased Groupthink: Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon where the desire for harmony or conformity in a group results in irrational decision-making. High cohesiveness can lead to groupthink, as members may suppress dissenting viewpoints to maintain consensus.

3. Improved Group Performance: Cohesive groups typically perform better because members work effectively together, communicate well, and share a common goal. However, this can depend on the structure and leadership of the group.

4. Reduced Group Conflict: While cohesiveness can mitigate some conflict, it can also lead to the avoidance of necessary debates and discussions, resulting in unresolved issues and latent conflict.

Conclusion

Among the listed options, the one that is NOT a consequence of group cohesiveness is Reduced Group Conflict, because while cohesiveness may lead to reduced conflict on the surface, it could also contribute to a lack of critical discussions and hidden tensions. Thus, while group cohesiveness enhances relationships, it does not necessarily reduce all forms of conflict.