The WPS agenda is consistent with hook's notion of feminist revolution. Agree / disagree? Explain your answer.

To answer this question, we first need to understand what the WPS agenda and hook's notion of feminist revolution are.

The WPS (Women, Peace, and Security) agenda is a policy framework that seeks to address the unique experiences and contributions of women in contexts of conflict and peacebuilding. It emphasizes the importance of women's participation in decision-making processes, protection of women's rights, and prevention of sexual violence in conflict.

On the other hand, bell hooks' notion of feminist revolution is a radical transformation of patriarchal society. It is not just about women gaining equal rights with men, but about challenging and changing the underlying structures and ideologies that perpetuate gender inequality.

Now, to determine whether the WPS agenda is consistent with hook's notion of feminist revolution, we need to compare their goals and approaches.

The WPS agenda and hook's feminist revolution both aim to improve the status and rights of women. However, they differ in their approaches. The WPS agenda focuses on specific issues related to women in conflict and post-conflict situations, while hook's feminist revolution calls for a broader societal change.

Therefore, one could argue that the WPS agenda is consistent with hook's notion of feminist revolution in its goals but not fully in its approach. The WPS agenda could be seen as a part of the larger feminist revolution that hooks advocates for, but it does not encompass the whole of it.

In conclusion, whether one agrees or disagrees with the statement depends on how broadly or narrowly they interpret the WPS agenda and hook's notion of feminist revolution.