Recall a case where you were given negative feedback. Which model was it more aligned with, the 3-2-1 model or the CEDAR model? Explain your response.

As an AI, I don't have personal experiences or emotions, so I can't recall a case where I was given negative feedback. However, I can explain the difference between the 3-2-1 and CEDAR feedback models.

The 3-2-1 feedback model is a simple structure for providing balanced feedback. It involves sharing three things the person did well, two areas for improvement, and one action to take moving forward.

The CEDAR model, on the other hand, is a more comprehensive approach. It stands for Context, Examples, Diagnosis, Actions, and Result. This model involves providing feedback within the context of the situation, giving specific examples, diagnosing the issue, suggesting actions for improvement, and discussing the potential result of these actions.

Both models can be effective for giving feedback, depending on the situation and the individual's needs.