Biological Evidence, such as blood, should be photographed prior to collection.Question 8Select one:TrueFalse

Answer

The statement is True.

Biological evidence, such as blood, should indeed be photographed prior to collection for several reasons:

1. Preservation of Evidence: Photographs provide a visual record of the evidence's condition, location, and context at the crime scene, which can be crucial for later analysis.

2. Documenting Location: Capturing the location and surrounding area of the biological evidence helps to establish how it relates to the scene and other evidence.

3. Chain of Custody: Photographic documentation helps maintain the chain of custody by showing the condition of the evidence before it was collected, thus supporting the integrity of the evidence in court.

4. Reference for Later Analysis: Photographs serve as references that can be used during testimony or analysis by forensic specialists to explain the evidence's context and significance.

Thus, it is essential and standard practice to photograph biological evidence like blood before collection.