If the measurement is destructive, this favours the use of a censusSelect one:TrueFalse

Answer

The statement is: False.

Explanation

Destructive measurement methods imply that the subject being measured cannot be reused or observed again after the measurement is taken. For example, testing materials under stress to failure destroys the material and prevents its further use. In this case, using a census—where every member of the population is measured—could lead to unnecessary destruction of a large number of subjects.

Instead, a sample survey is often more advantageous because it allows researchers to gather insights without having to destroy the entire population. By using sampling methods, researchers can still obtain meaningful data while preserving the integrity of the population.

In contrast, if measurements are non-destructive, a census may be more feasible as it does not compromise the subjects. Thus, the statement reflects a misunderstanding of when to use a census versus a sampling method in the context of destructive measurements.