Emaciated is to malnourished as undetectable is to _____luridtantalizingimperceptiblemonotonous

To solve the analogy "Emaciated is to malnourished as undetectable is to _____," we need to identify the relationship between the first pair of words and then apply that same relationship to find the appropriate word for the second pair.

1. Analyze the First Pair (Emaciated and Malnourished):

   • "Emaciated" describes a state of extreme thinness or weakness caused by lack of nutrition.
   • "Malnourished" refers to a state where an individual does not get enough nutrients.

   Here, "emaciated" is a specific result or condition that stems from being "malnourished".

2. Analyze the Second Pair (Undetectable and ____):

   • "Undetectable" means something that cannot be perceived or discovered.

   Following the same logic as the first pair, we need to find a word that represents a state or condition that arises from being "undetectable".

3. Consider the Options:

   • Lurid: Means very vivid in color, especially so as to create an unpleasantly harsh or unnatural effect. This does not match the concept.
   • Tantalizing: Means having a strong attraction or appeal, which also does not fit.
   • Imperceptible: Means something that cannot be perceived or hardly noticeable. This word aligns with the idea of being "undetectable".
   • Monotonous: Relates to something dull or lacking in variety, which is unrelated.

4. Conclusion:

   • The word that best completes the analogy is “imperceptible”.

Final Answer

The complete analogy is "Emaciated is to malnourished as undetectable is to imperceptible."