13.Why does the ability to undermine an original attitude depend on how contextualized the attitude already is?

The ability to undermine an original attitude depends on how contextualized the attitude already is because attitudes that are deeply ingrained and tied to a person's identity or worldview are more resistant to change.

Step 1: Understanding the Contextualization of Attitudes Contextualization refers to the degree to which an attitude is tied to a person's overall belief system or identity. For example, a person's attitude towards a political issue may be deeply tied to their overall political ideology.

Step 2: Resistance to Change When an attitude is highly contextualized, it is more resistant to change because it is tied to a person's identity or worldview. Changing this attitude would require changing a fundamental part of the person's identity, which is a difficult process.

Step 3: Undermining Attitudes Undermining an attitude refers to the process of changing or weakening it. This can be done through presenting new information or arguments that challenge the attitude. However, if the attitude is highly contextualized, it will be more resistant to these attempts at change.

Step 4: The Role of Contextualization Therefore, the ability to undermine an original attitude depends on how contextualized the attitude already is. The more contextualized the attitude, the more resistant it is to change, and the harder it will be to undermine. Conversely, attitudes that are less contextualized, or less tied to a person's identity, will be easier to change or undermine.