The framers gave the power to introduce “money bills” to the House of Representatives but not the Senate because they believed that

The framers of the U.S. Constitution gave the power to introduce "money bills" to the House of Representatives but not the Senate because they believed in the principle of "no taxation without representation."

Here are the steps explaining this:

1. The framers of the Constitution wanted to ensure that the citizens of the country had a direct say in any matters related to taxation.

2. The House of Representatives, unlike the Senate, is designed to represent the population of the country directly. The number of representatives each state gets in the House is based on its population. Therefore, the House is more closely tied to the people and their interests.

3. By giving the House the power to introduce money bills, the framers ensured that any decisions about taxation would be made by the body of government that is most directly accountable to the people.

4. This decision reflects the framers' belief in the principle of "no taxation without representation," a slogan that originated during the American Revolution and reflects the colonists' objection to being taxed by a British Parliament where they had no representation.

5. Therefore, by giving the power to introduce money bills to the House, the framers were trying to prevent a similar situation from happening in the newly formed United States.