Matt and Xiaohua have different ideas about good words to use in academic writing. What are they?

In academic writing, Matt and Xiaohua may have differing perspectives on the use of certain words and phrases.

1. Matt's Perspective:

   • Formal Language: Matt might prefer a more formal tone, using sophisticated vocabulary and avoiding colloquialisms. For example, he may favor "utilize" over "use" and "ascertain" over "find out".
   • Precision: He might advocate for precise language to convey ideas clearly without ambiguity. For instance, using “analyze” instead of “look into”.
   • Objective Tone: Matt could emphasize an objective tone, minimizing personal opinions and using third-person perspectives to maintain professionalism.

2. Xiaohua's Perspective:

   • Clarity and Accessibility: Xiaohua may prioritize clarity, opting for simpler words that are more accessible to a wider audience. For example, she might prefer "help" over "assist" or "show" instead of "demonstrate".
   • Active Voice: She might advocate for using active voice to make sentences clearer and more engaging, as opposed to passive constructions that can lead to confusion.
   • Inclusivity: Xiaohua may focus on inclusive language that avoids biases and is sensitive to diverse readers, promoting terms that are politically correct and socially aware.

Ultimately, both perspectives can be valid, depending on the context of the academic writing and the audience. Balancing formality with clarity is key in effective academic communication.