T or F: Inclusive Non-hedonism means that pleasure is not inherently good. Something else is (which may be power, preference-satisfaction, and others.

Analysis of the Statement

1. Definition Clarification: Inclusive Non-hedonism posits that pleasure is not the ultimate measure of goodness. Instead, it suggests that other factors (such as power, preference-satisfaction) may hold inherent value.

2. Implications of Non-hedonism: This philosophy values aspects of life beyond pleasure, indicating a broader evaluation of what constitutes a "good" life.

3. Contrast with Hedonism: Hedonism, in contrast, asserts that pleasure is the only intrinsic good. Inclusive Non-hedonism challenges this by allowing for multiple intrinsic values.

4. Philosophical Context: This concept aligns with various philosophical theories, such as certain forms of utilitarianism, which consider well-being that encompasses elements beyond immediate pleasure.

Conclusion

Based on the analysis, the statement is True: Inclusive Non-hedonism means that pleasure is not inherently good; rather, other factors such as power or preference-satisfaction may be considered good in their own right.