With which scientific methodology did the North Korean historians argue when criticizing the Soviet historians?

The North Korean historians primarily employed a methodological approach grounded in "Juche" ideology, which emphasizes self-reliance and an independent perspective. They argued that Soviet historians often imposed a Eurocentric view of history that neglected the unique experiences and struggles of the Korean people.

The following aspects characterized their critique:

1. Nationalistic Interpretation: North Korean historians focused on a nationalistic interpretation of history, highlighting the importance of Korean sovereignty and the role of Korean revolutionaries, rather than viewing historical events through a Soviet lens.

2. Class Struggle and Anti-Imperialism: They emphasized class struggle and anti-imperialist sentiments, arguing that Soviet historians diluted these aspects by focusing too heavily on the international communist movement instead of local contexts.

3. Archival and Primary Sources: North Korean historians sought to use Korean primary sources and archival material to support their claims, asserting that these sources were often overlooked by Soviet historians in favor of a generalized narrative.

4. Critique of Soviet Influence: They criticized Soviet influence on Korean history as undermining the revolutionary spirit of the Korean people, asserting that it led to a distorted understanding of the relationship between Korea and the Soviet Union.

By integrating these methodologies, North Korean historians sought to establish a historical narrative that reflected their ideological stance and underscored the distinct identity of the Korean Democratic People's Republic.