what do you think is the role played by governmental regulatory capacity (or lack of capacity) in explaining the existence of the 'governance gap' in BHR?

The 'governance gap' in Business and Human Rights (BHR) refers to the lack of effective mechanisms to hold corporations accountable for human rights abuses. The role of governmental regulatory capacity in explaining this gap can be understood in the following steps:

1. Regulatory Framework: The first step is to understand the regulatory framework that the government has in place. If the government lacks a comprehensive and effective regulatory framework for BHR, it can lead to a governance gap. This is because without proper regulations, corporations may not be held accountable for their actions that violate human rights.

2. Enforcement: Even if a government has a robust regulatory framework, the governance gap can still exist if the government lacks the capacity to enforce these regulations. This could be due to a lack of resources, corruption, or other factors that prevent the government from effectively enforcing its regulations.

3. International Standards: The government's capacity to adhere to and implement international standards and guidelines on BHR also plays a role. If a government lacks the capacity to do so, it can contribute to the governance gap.

4. Political Will: Lastly, the political will of the government is crucial. If a government lacks the political will to regulate corporations and protect human rights, it can lead to a governance gap. This could be due to a variety of reasons, including political pressure from corporations, a focus on economic growth over human rights, or a lack of awareness or concern about BHR issues.

In conclusion, the governmental regulatory capacity plays a significant role in explaining the existence of the 'governance gap' in BHR. Both the presence of a robust regulatory framework and the capacity and will to enforce it are necessary to close this gap.