The state with de facto cannot undergo state succession. The state with de jure recognition can under state succession.

The first statement states that a state with de facto recognition cannot undergo state succession.

To understand this, let's break it down step by step:

1. De facto recognition: This refers to a situation where a state is recognized as a sovereign entity by other states, even if it does not have formal or legal recognition. It means that the state is functioning and has control over a territory, but its status may not be universally accepted.

2. State succession: This refers to the process by which a new state emerges or replaces an existing state. It can happen due to various reasons such as independence, secession, or territorial changes.

Based on the first statement, it implies that a state with de facto recognition cannot undergo state succession. This means that even if the state meets the criteria for state succession, it will not be recognized as a new state by the international community.

Now let's move on to the second statement:

1. De jure recognition: This refers to a situation where a state is formally and legally recognized by other states. It means that the state has fulfilled the necessary criteria and is considered a legitimate member of the international community.

2. State succession: As mentioned earlier, this refers to the process of a new state emerging or replacing an existing state.

According to the second statement, a state with de jure recognition can undergo state succession. This means that if the state meets the criteria for state succession, it will be recognized as a new state by the international community.

In summary, the difference between a state with de facto and de jure recognition lies in their ability to undergo state succession. A state with de facto recognition cannot undergo state succession, while a state with de jure recognition can.