9. Which of the following advantages we lose by using multiple inheritances?Both Dynamic binding & PolymorphismConstructorPolymorphismDynamic binding

The question seems to be asking which advantages are lost when using multiple inheritance in programming. The options given are:

1. Both Dynamic binding & Polymorphism
2. Constructor
3. Polymorphism
4. Dynamic binding

Multiple inheritance refers to a feature of some object-oriented programming languages in which a class can inherit behaviors and features from more than one superclass.

The advantages we lose by using multiple inheritance are not universally agreed upon and can depend on the specific programming language and the way it's used. However, generally speaking, multiple inheritance can lead to a lot of confusion when two base classes implement a method with the same name.

In the context of this question, it's important to note that multiple inheritance does not inherently cause a loss of dynamic binding or polymorphism. These are features of object-oriented programming that are typically still available when using multiple inheritance.

Therefore, none of the options provided are universally correct. The loss of advantages with multiple inheritance more commonly refers to increased complexity and potential for confusion, rather than a loss of these specific features.