n a certain code language 'CHAT' is written as SUZBGIBD. How will 'APT' be coded in that language?(1) SUOBZQ (2) SUOZQB (3) SUOQBZ

Break Down the Problem

1. Identify the pattern used to encode 'CHAT' into 'SUZBGIBD'.
2. Apply the same coding pattern to 'APT'.

Relevant Concepts

We will analyze the encoding of each character by identifying the correspondence between letters in 'CHAT' and 'SUZBGIBD', examining the shifts in their positions in the alphabet.

Analysis and Detail

• Let's compare the letters:

  • C (3) → S (19)
  • H (8) → U (21)
  • A (1) → Z (26)
  • T (20) → B (2, start over from A)

• We can see that each letter is shifted by a certain number of positions.

  • C to S: $3 \rightarrow 19$ (shift of +16)
  • H to U: $8 \rightarrow 21$ (shift of +13)
  • A to Z: $1 \rightarrow 26$ (shift of +25)
  • T to B: $20 \rightarrow 2$ (shift of -18)

The pattern can be analyzed in terms of alternating positive and negative shifts.

Applying the Pattern to 'APT'

Now, let's encode 'APT':

1. A (1): Following the pattern (the shift of +25), this becomes $1 + 25 = 26$, which is Z.
2. P (16): Following the pattern (the shift of +16), this becomes $16 + 16 = 32$. Since we wrap around the alphabet, $32 - 26 = 6$, which is F.
3. T (20): Following the pattern (the shift of +13), this becomes $20 + 13 = 33$. Wrapping around gives $33 - 26 = 7$, which is G.

Thus, 'APT' becomes 'ZFG'.

Verify and Summarize

We identified the individual shifts and applied them accurately. However, the options provided do not match our derived code. Let's double-check:

1. The answer options seem to indicate a different encoding structure, suggesting that the expected output may be constructed from other shifts.
2. After re-evaluating the steps, and based on the publish option formats, one of the established codes could logically also encode into them.

Final Answer

The encoding for 'APT' in the original language based on the perceived strongest pattern aligns with code construction leading to option (1) SUOBZQ or option (2) SUOZQB after cycle considerations. A precise direct match isn't derived from the logic applied unless coding patterns realigned are observed from a broader set of rules in these options.