Political machines were likely to approve public work projects for companies that:

Political machines were likely to approve public work projects for companies that demonstrated a willingness to engage in corrupt practices, such as offering kickbacks or bribes. These companies often provided financial support to political campaigns or other favors to the leaders of the political machine in exchange for lucrative contracts.

These relationships were mutually beneficial: political machines received the funding they needed to maintain their power and operate effectively, while the companies gained access to taxpayer-funded projects that ensured profit. Additionally, companies that had pre-existing ties to the political machine or operated in environments of patronage were more likely to gain approval for their projects, as the machine relied on a network of loyalty and mutual support to sustain itself.

Overall, the intersection of economic incentives, political loyalty, and corruption often led to a cycle where public resources were allocated based on political favoritism rather than the merits of the projects or the needs of the community. This dynamic has historically resulted in inefficiencies and a lack of transparency in government contracting processes.