What are the two ways that a moral argument can go wrong? Give an example of an argument that fails in  one of these ways

A moral argument can go wrong in two main ways:

1. Invalid Logic: This occurs when the argument does not follow a logical structure, meaning the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.

Example: Premise 1: All humans have a right to life. Premise 2: John is a human. Conclusion: Therefore, John has a right to own a car.

In this example, the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises. While it's established that John, being a human, has a right to life, it doesn't logically imply that he has a right to own a car.

2. False Premises: This occurs when one or more of the premises (the statements upon which the argument is based) are false.

Example: Premise 1: All dogs can fly. Premise 2: Fido is a dog. Conclusion: Therefore, Fido can fly.

In this example, the argument is logically valid (if the premises were true, the conclusion would necessarily follow), but it's unsound because the first premise is false. Dogs cannot fly, so the argument fails due to a false premise.