Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

Give an example of a process in the 3-period model that is a Martingale process but is not a Markov process. Prove both assertions.

Question

Give an example of a process in the 3-period model that is a Martingale process but is not a Markov process. Prove both assertions.

🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

To address your question, let's first provide a brief definition to understand our terms clearly.

  • Martingale Process: A stochastic process XnX_n is a martingale with respect to another stochastic process YnY_n if for all nn, E[Xn+1Y1,Y2,,Yn]=XnE[X_{n+1} | Y_1, Y_2, \ldots, Y_n] = X_n.
  • Markov Process: A stochastic process XnX_n is a Markov process if the future state is independent of the past states given the present state, meaning for all nn: P(Xn+1Xn,Xn1,)=P(Xn+1Xn)P(X_{n+1} | X_n, X_{n-1}, \ldots) = P(X_{n+1} | X_n).

Example of a 3-Period Model

  1. Define the Process: Let's consider a process XnX_n where n=0,1,2,3n = 0, 1, 2, 3. Define the outcomes as follows:

    • At time 0, X0=0X_0 = 0.
    • At time 1, X1X_1 can be either 11 or 1-1 with equal probability, i.e., P(X1=1)=P(X1=1)=12P(X_1 = 1) = P(X_1 = -1) = \frac{1}{2}.
    • At time 2, X2X_2 can be either 22, 00, or 2-2 with the following probabilities:
      • P(X2=2X1=1)=1P(X_2 = 2 | X_1 = 1) = 1
      • P(X2=0X1=1)=0P(X_2 = 0 | X_1 = 1) = 0
      • P(X2=2X1=1)=1P(X_2 = -2 | X_1 = -1) = 1
    • At time 3, let X3X_3 always equal 1, irrespective of X2X_2.
  2. Verify Martingale Property: To prove that XnX_n is a martingale:

    • Calculate E[X1X0]=X0=0E[X_1 | X_0] = X_0 = 0: E[X1X0]=1P(X1=1X0)+(1)P(X1=1X0)=112+(1)12=0 E[X_1 | X_0] = 1 \cdot P(X_1=1 | X_0) + (-1) \cdot P(X_1=-1 | X_0) = 1 \cdot \frac{1}{2} + (-1) \cdot \frac{1}{2} = 0

    • Next, calculate E[X2X1]E[X_2 | X_1]:

      • If X1=1X_1 = 1, then X2=2X_2 = 2 with probability 1: E[X2X1=1]=2 E[X_2 | X_1 = 1] = 2
      • If X1=1X_1 = -1, then X2=2X_2 = -2 with probability 1: E[X2X1=1]=2 E[X_2 | X_1 = -1] = -2
      • However, notice E[X2]=0E[X_2] = 0 because each outcome is equally probable.
    • Finally, calculate E[X3X2]=1E[X_3 | X_2] = 1 which does not depend on the value of X2X_2.

  3. Check Non-Markov Property: For it to be a Markov process, the future state must depend only on the present state.

    Consider X3 X_3 : P(X3=1X2=2)=1andP(X3=1X2=2)=1 P(X_3 = 1 | X_2 = 2) = 1 \quad \text{and} \quad P(X_3 = 1 | X_2 = -2) = 1

    However, the transition from X1X_1 to X2X_2 also depends on X0X_{0}. Thus, the transition from X1X_1 to X2X_2 depends on the entire history (not only on XnX_n), hence, XnX_n is not a Markov process.

Final Answer

The process XnX_n defined above is a martingale because it satisfies the definition E[Xn+1Xn]=XnE[X_{n+1} | X_n] = X_n, but it is not a Markov process due to its dependence on the past states in determining X3X_3.

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

How does the state of the process is described in HMM?a) Literalb) Single random variablec) Single discrete random variabled) None of the mentioned

Which of the following is not a State of Five-State Process Model?Group of answer choicesNewRunningStopReady

Suppose a variable 𝑧𝑧 follows a Wiener process if it has the following twoproperties

What is continuous time Markov chain? Explain why the birth-and-death process is a special type of continuous time Markov chain.

Which of the following is NOT an example of a transaction?

1/1

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.