If both tables are pre-sorted on the join columns the optimizer chooses a HASH join, which is faster and uses considerably fewer resources.A.TrueB.False
Question
If both tables are pre-sorted on the join columns the optimizer chooses a HASH join, which is faster and uses considerably fewer resources.
A. True
B. False
Solution
Answer
The statement is B. False.
In a database context, if both tables are pre-sorted on the join columns, the optimizer is more likely to choose a Merge Join rather than a Hash Join. A Merge Join is efficient when the input data is already sorted, as it allows the operation to be performed in a single pass through each table. In contrast, a Hash Join is typically used when the data is not sorted and involves building a hash table for one of the tables, which can be resource-intensive.
Thus, the presence of pre-sorted data suggests a more efficient Merge Join over a Hash Join, making the initial statement inaccurate.
Similar Questions
The purpose of SQL joins is to combine rows from two or more tables based on a related column.a.Trueb.False
he choice of a join style is a matter of preference except for applicability of the join style.1 pointTrueFalse
A hash table is always faster than a binary search tree for searching elements.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse
Understanding the primary and foreign key relationship is not important to join on the correct columns.a.Trueb.False
FP-growth is faster because it goes over the dataset only....Select one:a. Twiceb. Ones
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.