why the net sown area and the landunder forests have changed from 1960-61to 2014-15 very marginally
Question
Why has the net sown area and the land under forests changed from 1960-61 to 2014-15 very marginally?
Solution
The changes in net sown area and land under forests from 1960-61 to 2014-15 could be marginal due to several reasons:
-
Land Use Policy: The land use policy of a country plays a significant role in determining the net sown area and the land under forests. If the policy is to maintain a balance between agricultural activities and forest conservation, then there might not be significant changes in these areas.
-
Agricultural Practices: The adoption of modern agricultural practices like multiple cropping and use of high yielding variety seeds can increase the productivity per unit area. This reduces the need to increase the net sown area.
-
Forest Conservation Efforts: Efforts to conserve forests and increase the forest cover can also limit the changes in the land under forests. This includes initiatives like afforestation and reforestation, strict regulation against deforestation, etc.
-
Urbanization and Industrialization: Rapid urbanization and industrialization can also limit the changes in the net sown area and the land under forests. This is because these processes often lead to the conversion of agricultural and forest lands into residential, commercial, or industrial areas.
-
Climate Change: Changes in climate patterns can also affect the net sown area and the land under forests. For instance, increased incidences of droughts or floods can reduce the area suitable for cultivation or can lead to the loss of forest cover.
Without specific data or additional context, it's difficult to pinpoint the exact reasons for the marginal changes in the net sown area and the land under forests from 1960-61 to 2014-15. However, the factors mentioned above are some of the potential reasons.
Similar Questions
Agricultural land is now farther away from city centers than it was in the past because of
One factor that can help ecoregions resistant to change is _______Group of answer choicesBiodiversityHigh windAccess to freshwaterPrecipitation
How do the benefits of natural change to ecosystems compare to the disadvantages?
The benefits of forests include ______.Multiple select question.recreationproviding wildlife habitatwoodcarbon dioxide productionerosion
South facing slopes have more trees and more developed soil.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.