Table 2 can be derived from table 1 byA. SegmentationB. ReplicationC. RedundancyD. Fragmentation

To determine how Table 2 can be derived from Table 1, let's analyze the options provided:

1. Segmentation: This involves dividing data into segments based on certain criteria.
2. Replication: This refers to creating copies of data, leading to redundancy.
3. Redundancy: This occurs when the same data is stored in multiple places.
4. Fragmentation: This is a technique of dividing data into smaller pieces or fragments.

Analysis of Options

• Segmentation is often used to organize data but does not necessarily lead to creating a separate table unless specifically ordered or filtered.
• Replication involves creating an exact copy, which would not change the structure of data from Table 1 to Table 2 unless modifications were made.
• Redundancy is important but typically refers to data stored in a way that leads to inefficiency.
• Fragmentation involves breaking down data into smaller parts, which can often be seen in database management and can lead to subsets.

Based on the definitions and implications of each option, the most suitable choice would depend on the exact nature of the transformation from Table 1 to Table 2.

Final Answer

Without additional context about the specifics of Table 1 and Table 2, the most logical answer would be D. Fragmentation, as it involves creating parts from a larger whole, which is likely how Table 2 could represent or derive data from Table 1.