Of the two techniques of project evaluation IRR and NPV,  which one will you choose and why? 40 Responses

Choosing between the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and Net Present Value (NPV) methods for project evaluation depends on the specific circumstances and objectives of the project. Here are some considerations:

1. Cash Flow: If the project has unconventional cash flows (cash flow sign changes more than once), then IRR may give multiple values, making it a less reliable method. In such cases, NPV is preferred.

2. Reinvestment Assumption: IRR assumes that the cash flows are reinvested at the IRR itself, which may not be realistic. On the other hand, NPV assumes that the cash flows are reinvested at the cost of capital, which is generally more realistic.

3. Size of the Projects: If you are comparing projects of different sizes, NPV is a better method. This is because IRR is a relative measure (a percentage), while NPV is an absolute measure (a dollar amount).

4. Mutually Exclusive Projects: If you are choosing between mutually exclusive projects, NPV is generally a better method. This is because IRR can potentially select a smaller project with a higher percentage return over a larger project with a lower percentage return but higher dollar return.

5. Capital Rationing: If the firm has capital rationing, IRR is a better method as it gives the rate of return of the projects, which can be compared with the cost of capital.

In conclusion, both IRR and NPV have their advantages and disadvantages. The choice between the two methods depends on the specific circumstances and objectives of the project. However, in general, many finance professionals prefer NPV because it measures wealth creation in absolute terms and makes more realistic reinvestment rate assumptions.