Premise 1: All cats have fur.Premise 2: Some animals with fur are not cats.Conclusion: Therefore, some animals that are not cats
Question
Premise 1: All cats have fur.
Premise 2: Some animals with fur are not cats.
Conclusion: Therefore, some animals that are not cats.
Solution
The conclusion based on the given premises would be: "Therefore, some animals that are not cats have fur."
Here's the step by step reasoning:
-
From Premise 1, we know that all cats have fur. This means that fur is a characteristic of all cats.
-
From Premise 2, we know that there are some animals with fur that are not cats. This means that there are other animals besides cats that also have fur.
-
Therefore, combining these two premises, we can conclude that there are some animals that are not cats that have fur. This is because fur is not exclusive to cats, as there are other animals with fur as well.
Similar Questions
If all cats are mammals, and some mammals are black, which of the following statements must be true?
Which of the following statements is true?A. All cats are animals.B. All animals are cats.C. Some cats are animals.D. Some animals are cats.
If all Cats are Mammals and some Mammals are Carnivores, which of the following must be true?
Given, "If I have a Siberian Husky, then I have a dog." Identify the conclusion.
All animals are _______.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.