Why 30 participants for quantitative research?
Research Question
Academic Insights
The choice of 30 participants for quantitative research is often based on practical considerations and the need to balance statistical power with resource constraints.
Key Insights
- Practicality and Feasibility:
- In many studies, a sample size of 30 is chosen because it is manageable and feasible within the constraints of time, budget, and resources .
- Statistical Power:
- A sample size of 30 is often considered the minimum number needed to achieve a reasonable level of statistical power, which allows for the detection of significant effects or differences .
- Representativeness:
- While larger samples are generally more representative of the population, a sample size of 30 can still provide a reasonable approximation, especially in pilot studies or preliminary research .
- Methodological Justification:
- Some studies do not provide explicit justifications for their sample sizes, which can be a methodological oversight. However, 30 participants are often used as a rule of thumb in the absence of more specific calculations .
Conclusion
The choice of 30 participants in quantitative research is often a balance between practical constraints and the need for sufficient statistical power. While it may not always be the optimal sample size, it is frequently used as a practical compromise in preliminary or feasibility studies.
The Sensitivity of Respondent-driven Sampling Method
Unjustified Sample Sizes and Generalizations in Explainable AI Research: Principles for More Inclusive User Studies
Classify Participants in Online Communities
Assessing the Rigor of Machine Learning in Physiological Signal Processing Applications
Parametric estimation. Finite sample theory
Gradient-based Sampling: An Adaptive Importance Sampling for Least-squares
To Participate Or Not To Participate: An Investigation Of Strategic Participation In Standards
Biological Observer-Participation and Wheeler's 'Law without Law'
Association of State-Level Opioid-Reduction Policies With Pediatric Opioid Poisoning.
Application of the “Parent Essay” to Study Parental Attitudes in Forensic Psychological Examination
Unbiased estimation of sampling variance for Simpson's diversity index
Pareto Smoothed Importance Sampling
Strategies and Vulnerabilities of Participants in Venezuelan Influence Operations
On Justification of Gibbs Distribution
Predicting Participation in Cancer Screening Programs with Machine Learning
Justification of the application of Raman-fluorescence diagnostics to assess dental status of the oral cavity
Beliefs about an Offender’s Capacity to Be Rehabilitated: Black Offenders Are Seen as More Capable of Change
Justification of Recommender Systems Results: A Service-based Approach
Dynamic Conflict Resolution Using Justification Based Reasoning
Factors involved in Cancer Screening Participation: Multilevel Mediation Model
Related Questions
- What is the significance of sample size in research?
- How does participant number affect data validity?
- What are the advantages of having 30 participants?
- Can fewer participants still yield reliable results?
- What statistical methods are used with 30 participants?
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.