In what way was the administration of the Companydifferent from that of Indian rulers?

The administration of the East India Company was different from that of Indian rulers in several ways:

1. Centralized System: The Company had a centralized system of administration. It was governed by the Board of Directors in London. This was different from the decentralized system of administration followed by Indian rulers where each region had its own local ruler.

2. Bureaucracy: The Company established a bureaucratic system. It was based on merit and promotion was by seniority. This was different from the Indian rulers' system where positions were often hereditary.

3. Legal System: The Company introduced a uniform legal system. The laws were written and were the same for all people. This was different from the Indian rulers' system where laws could vary from region to region and were often not written down.

4. Revenue Collection: The Company introduced a system of revenue collection that was more systematic and efficient. This was different from the Indian rulers' system where revenue collection was often arbitrary and inconsistent.

5. Education and Social Reforms: The Company also introduced western education and social reforms. This was different from the Indian rulers who followed traditional systems of education and social norms.

6. Infrastructure Development: The Company invested in infrastructure development like railways, telegraph, postal service etc. This was not common during the rule of Indian rulers.

In conclusion, the administration of the Company was more systematic, uniform and efficient compared to that of Indian rulers.