Find a counterexample to the statement that every positive integer can be written as the sum of thesquares of three integers.1
Question
Find a counterexample to the statement that every positive integer can be written as the sum of the squares of three integers.
Solution
Sure, let's find a counterexample to the statement that every positive integer can be written as the sum of the squares of three integers.
The statement is not true for the number 7.
Let's see why:
The squares of integers are 0, 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, and so on.
If we try to express 7 as the sum of three of these numbers, we find that it's not possible.
For example, if we use 1 and 4, the smallest squares after 0, the third number would have to be 2 (because 7 - 1 - 4 = 2), but 2 is not a square of an integer.
Therefore, 7 is a counterexample to the statement.
Similar Questions
Which is the smallest number that can be written in two ways as the sum oftwo perfect squares
If a = bq + r where b = 3, then any integer can be expressed as a =3q, 3q + 1, 3q +2 Only 3qOnly 3q + 1None of the above
The sum of the squares of three numbers is 138, while the sum of their products taken two at a time is 131. Their sum is:
Given a set of non-negative integers, and a value S, determine if there is a subset of the given set with sum equal to S.
Sum of the squares of first n natural numbers exceeds their sum by 330, then n =
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.