An invention shall not be considered new if it forms.(2 Points)EquivalentsNoveltyNon-prejudicial Disclosure

The question seems incomplete as it does not specify what the invention forms. However, based on the options provided, it seems like the question is asking under what conditions an invention would not be considered new.

1. Equivalents: If an invention is equivalent to an existing one, meaning it performs the same function in the same way to achieve the same result, it may not be considered new. This is based on the doctrine of equivalents, a legal rule in many patent systems.

2. Novelty: Novelty is a requirement for a patent. If an invention lacks novelty, meaning it is not new or it has been previously disclosed or used, it cannot be patented. Therefore, an invention shall not be considered new if it lacks novelty.

3. Non-prejudicial Disclosure: Non-prejudicial disclosures are disclosures of the invention that do not affect its novelty. This can include disclosures made by the inventor within a certain period before filing a patent application. However, the rules on what constitutes a non-prejudicial disclosure can vary between different patent systems. If an invention has been disclosed in a way that is considered prejudicial, it may not be considered new.

Please note that patent laws can vary greatly between different countries and regions, so the exact criteria for what makes an invention new can depend on the specific patent system.