Explain how the authors make their points convincing and engaging about why women should be allowed to vote. Write your answer in the space below.

To answer this question, I would need the specific text or source material you're referring to. However, I can provide a general analysis of how authors might make their points convincing and engaging about why women should be allowed to vote.

1. Use of Facts and Statistics: Authors often use hard data to support their arguments. They might include statistics about the number of women who are educated, employed, or contributing to society in significant ways to argue that women are just as capable as men and should, therefore, have the right to vote.

2. Emotional Appeal: Authors can use personal stories or anecdotes to connect with their readers on an emotional level. For example, they might share stories of women who have been affected by policies they had no say in because they couldn't vote.

3. Logical Reasoning: Authors can use logical reasoning to make their points. They might argue that since women make up about half of the population, it's only fair and logical that they should have an equal say in how the country is run.

4. Use of Authority: Authors might quote experts or respected figures who support women's suffrage. This can lend credibility to their arguments and make them more convincing.

5. Engaging Writing Style: To keep readers engaged, authors need to write in a way that's interesting and easy to understand. They might use a conversational tone, ask rhetorical questions, or use other literary devices to keep the reader interested.

6. Addressing Counterarguments: A convincing argument also addresses potential counterarguments. Authors might acknowledge the arguments against women's suffrage and then refute them, which can make their own argument seem more thorough and well-considered.

Remember, this is a general analysis. For a more specific answer, I would need the actual text or source material you're referring to.