Absence of decomposers in the environment will lead toa.more number of producersb.litter all aroundc.clean environmentd.nature will be replenished of nutrients
Question
Absence of decomposers in the environment will lead to:
a. more number of producers
b. litter all around
c. clean environment
d. nature will be replenished of nutrients
Solution
The absence of decomposers in the environment would lead to litter all around. Here's why:
Decomposers play a crucial role in the ecosystem by breaking down dead or decaying organisms. They are responsible for carrying out the process of decomposition, which returns vital nutrients back into the environment.
Without decomposers, these dead organisms would not be broken down and recycled into the ecosystem. This would result in a build-up of waste, or "litter," in the environment.
So, the correct answer is (b) litter all around.
The other options are incorrect because: a) The number of producers would not necessarily increase. Producers need nutrients in the soil to grow, and without decomposers, these nutrients would not be replenished. c) The environment would not be cleaner. In fact, it would be filled with the litter of dead and decaying organisms. d) Nature would not be replenished of nutrients. As mentioned, decomposers are needed to return nutrients to the soil. Without them, this process would not occur.
Similar Questions
Discuss what you think would happen if decomposers and detritivores were removed from an ecosystem.
What are the causes & effects of these impacts of destruction of natrual ecosystems in the gbr
Describe briefly the role of decomposers in an ecosystem. State two examples of decomposers.
How do the benefits of natural change to ecosystems compare to the disadvantages?
Explain which ecosystem is more resilient by describing what would happen to each if the wrasse went extinct.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.