Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts and unfairly condemned in history? Discuss with reference  history

This question is asking for a discussion on the topic of subjectivity in both the arts and history. It suggests that subjectivity is overly celebrated in the arts and unfairly condemned in history. Here's a step-by-step guide on how to approach this question:

1. Define Subjectivity: Start by defining what subjectivity means. Subjectivity refers to how someone's judgment is shaped by personal opinions and feelings instead of outside influences. It's based on individual perspectives and experiences, and it can vary greatly from one person to another.

2. Discuss Subjectivity in Arts: Discuss how subjectivity is celebrated in the arts. You can talk about how art is a form of personal expression and how it's open to interpretation. Each artist brings their unique perspective and emotions to their work, and each viewer can have a different interpretation of the same piece of art. This celebration of subjectivity can make art more diverse and enriching.

3. Discuss Subjectivity in History: Then, discuss how subjectivity is viewed in history. Historically, subjectivity has been seen as a source of bias and has been criticized for distorting the truth. Historians strive for objectivity to provide an accurate representation of events. However, it's important to note that complete objectivity is impossible to achieve, and all historical accounts are influenced by the historian's perspective to some extent.

4. Compare the Two: Compare the role of subjectivity in arts and history. While it's celebrated in the arts for adding depth and diversity, it's often condemned in history because it can distort the truth. However, subjectivity is inherent in both fields to some extent.

5. Form a Conclusion: Finally, form a conclusion based on your discussion. You could argue that subjectivity isn't overly celebrated in the arts or unfairly condemned in history, but rather, it plays a different role in each field. Or, you could argue that the celebration of subjectivity in the arts and its condemnation in history is justified due to the different purposes these fields serve.

Remember, there's no right or wrong answer to this question. It's all about presenting a well-reasoned argument based on your understanding of the topic.