Li et al’s analysis of maker’s marks on terracotta army only identified one workshop who was working directly for the palace. True False

The statement that "Li et al’s analysis of maker’s marks on the terracotta army only identified one workshop who was working directly for the palace" is False.

Li et al. conducted a comprehensive study involving the analysis of maker's marks found on the terracotta figures of the army. Their research indicated the presence of multiple workshops or artisans contributing to the production of the terracotta army, rather than a singular workshop. This finding highlights the collaborative nature of the artisans involved in such a large-scale project, reflecting the organization and resource allocation within the ancient production systems of the time. Moreover, the existence of diverse maker's marks suggests not only varying styles and techniques but also the economic and social structures that supported such craftsmanship, indicating that artisans were likely working for different patrons, including the palace and other entities. Thus, the claim that only one workshop was identified is inaccurate based on the broader context of their findings.