Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

Consider the following proof:EE → P..∴ (P ∧ E) ∨ VWhich of the following is a derivation needed for this proof?P → EP ∨ EVP

Question

Consider the following proof:

EE → P
..∴ (P ∧ E) ∨ V

Which of the following is a derivation needed for this proof?

  • P → E
  • P ∨ E
  • P
  • V
🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

To determine which derivation is needed for the proof EEP EE \rightarrow P leading to (PE)V (P \land E) \lor V , we need to analyze the provided options.

Analysis of Options

  1. Option 1: PE P \rightarrow E

    • This statement suggests that if P P is true, then E E is true. However, it does not directly contribute to deriving (PE)V (P \land E) \lor V from EEP EE \rightarrow P .
  2. Option 2: PE P \lor E

    • This standard disjunction indicates that either P P or E E is true. While it provides some flexibility, it does not directly assist in reaching the conclusion regarding (PE)V (P \land E) \lor V .
  3. Option 3: PV P \lor V

    • Here, we are stating that either P P is true or V V is true. This may seem somewhat related to the conclusion since if P P is valid, it can contribute to the complete disjunction needed for the proof’s conclusion.

Conclusion

Given that none of the options perfectly match the expected derivations required to connect EEP EE \rightarrow P to (PE)V (P \land E) \lor V , we can infer that the more probable connection might be through PV P \lor V , indicating the acceptance of either being the case could be essential for reaching the final conclusion.

Final Answer

The derivation needed for this proof is PV P \lor V .

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

The equation E = pc is valid (here E is energy, P is momentum and c is speed of light in vacuum) :

(p → q) ∧ (p → r) is logically equivalent top ∧ (q ∨ r)p → (q ∧ r) p ∨ (q ∧ r) p → (q ∨ r)

Questão 6Se P, Q, R e S forem proposições simples, então as proposições P v R → Q ^ S e (~Q)v (~S) → (~P) ^ (~R) serão equivalentes.1 pontoCertoErrado

The last line of a proof represents the given information (choose the correct answer):

The biconditional statement "p if and only if q" is equivalent to:a.p → qb.p ∧ qc.p ∨ qd.(p → q) ∧ (q → p)

1/1

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.