To determine which theorist is NOT considered a semiotics theorist, let's analyze the contributions of each of the provided individuals in the context of semiotics:

1. **Charles Peirce**: He is one of the founding figures of semiotics, known for his work on the nature of signs and the theory of triadic relations (representamen, object, and interpretant).

2. **Marshall McLuhan**: Primarily known for his work on media theory and the effects of media on human perception and society, McLuhan is not primarily characterized as a semiotics theorist, though his ideas incorporate elements relating to signs and communication.

3. **Roland Barthes**: A critical figure in semiotics, Barthes analyzed the role of signs in cultural texts and is well-known for his writings on the relationship between signs and meaning.

4. **Ferdinand de Saussure**: He is credited with laying the foundation for semiotics through his theory of the sign, which includes the concepts of the signifier and the signified.

### Conclusion:
Based on this analysis, **b. Marshall McLuhan** is the theorist who is NOT primarily considered a semiotics theorist. His work, while closely related, is more focused on media and communication than on the theory of signs itself.

Question

To determine which theorist is NOT considered a semiotics theorist, let's analyze the contributions of each of the provided individuals in the context of semiotics:

1. **Charles Peirce**: He is one of the founding figures of semiotics, known for his work on the nature of signs and the theory of triadic relations (representamen, object, and interpretant).

2. **Marshall McLuhan**: Primarily known for his work on media theory and the effects of media on human perception and society, McLuhan is not primarily characterized as a semiotics theorist, though his ideas incorporate elements relating to signs and communication.

3. **Roland Barthes**: A critical figure in semiotics, Barthes analyzed the role of signs in cultural texts and is well-known for his writings on the relationship between signs and meaning.

4. **Ferdinand de Saussure**: He is credited with laying the foundation for semiotics through his theory of the sign, which includes the concepts of the signifier and the signified.

### Conclusion:
Based on this analysis, **b. Marshall McLuhan** is the theorist who is NOT primarily considered a semiotics theorist. His work, while closely related, is more focused on media and communication than on the theory of signs itself.

Knowee AI · Accepted Answer

To determine which theorist is NOT considered a semiotics theorist, let's analyze the contributions of each of the provided individuals in the context of semiotics:

1. **Charles Peirce**: He is one of the founding figures of semiotics, known for his work on the nature of signs and the theory of triadic relations (representamen, object, and interpretant).

2. **Marshall McLuhan**: Primarily known for his work on media theory and the effects of media on human perception and society, McLuhan is not primarily characterized as a semiotics theorist, though his ideas incorporate elements relating to signs and communication.

3. **Roland Barthes**: A critical figure in semiotics, Barthes analyzed the role of signs in cultural texts and is well-known for his writings on the relationship between signs and meaning.

4. **Ferdinand de Saussure**: He is credited with laying the foundation for semiotics through his theory of the sign, which includes the concepts of the signifier and the signified.

### Conclusion:
Based on this analysis, **b. Marshall McLuhan** is the theorist who is NOT primarily considered a semiotics theorist. His work, while closely related, is more focused on media and communication than on the theory of signs itself.

Which of these theorists is NOT considered a semiotics theorist?Question 9Answera.Charles Pierceb.Marshall McLuhanc.Roland Barthesd.Ferdinand de Saussure

Question

Which of these theorists is NOT considered a semiotics theorist?

Solution

Conclusion:

Similar Questions

Upgrade your grade with Knowee