A three-dimensional object cannot be built from two-dimensional objects.A.TrueB.False
Question
A three-dimensional object cannot be built from two-dimensional objects.
- A. True
- B. False
Solution
Analyzing the Statement
-
Understanding Dimensions: A two-dimensional object has only length and width (like a square or circle), while a three-dimensional object has length, width, and height (like a cube or sphere).
-
Construction of 3D Objects: Although two-dimensional objects can represent surfaces or sides of a three-dimensional object, they cannot encompass volume or depth on their own.
-
Combination of Objects: However, if you consider assembling multiple two-dimensional objects together, they can form the surfaces of a three-dimensional object but not the volume unless they are transformed into three-dimensional shapes or are part of a composite structure.
Conclusion
In the strictest sense, a singular two-dimensional object cannot constitute a three-dimensional object on its own.
Final Answer
A. True
Similar Questions
To describe a solid in geometry, it suffices to have two dimensions.A.TrueB.False
Three-dimensional figures can be located on a Cartesian coordinate system.A.TrueB.False
Constructing a cube with double the volume of another cube using only a straightedge and compass was proven possible by advanced algebra.A.TrueB.False
Drawing is to two-dimensional as painting is to?*A. One-dimensionalB. Two-dimensionalC. Three-dimensionalD. Multi-dimensional
Which of the following geometric objects occupy one dimension?Check all that apply.A.RayB.PlaneC.TriangleD.PointE.SegmentF.LineSUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.