Denying free legal aid isAviolation of fundamental rightBviolation of directive principlesCcontempt of courtDnone of these

To address the question of whether denying free legal aid constitutes a violation of certain rights or principles, let's analyze the options presented:

1. Fundamental Rights: The Constitution of India provides for the right to free legal aid as a fundamental right under Article 21, which ensures the right to life and personal liberty. Denying legal aid can impede a person's ability to secure justice, thus potentially violating their fundamental rights.

2. Directive Principles: While the Directive Principles of State Policy encourage the state to provide free legal aid (Article 39A), they are not justiciable, meaning they cannot be enforced in a court of law. Therefore, denying free legal aid does not directly violate these principles in a legal sense.

3. Contempt of Court: Contempt of court generally pertains to actions that disrespect or disobey court orders or undermine the court's authority. Denying legal aid is not classified as contempt of court.

4. None of These: This option suggests that denying free legal aid does not fall under any of the aforementioned categories.

Conclusion

Based on the analysis, the correct option that best reflects the situation is A - Violation of fundamental right. Denying free legal aid can impede an individual's access to justice, which is a fundamental right under the Constitution.