Let (xn) be a bounded sequence in R. Show that there exist subsequences (xnk ) and(xmk ) of (xn) such thatlimk→∞ xnk = lim sup xn and limk→∞ xmk = lim inf xn.
Question
Solution 1
To prove this, we will use the definitions of limit superior (lim sup) and limit inferior (lim inf) of a sequence.
- Let's start with lim sup. By definition, lim sup of a sequence (xn) is the smallest number 'L' such that for any positive number ε, there exists a natural number N such that for all Knowee AI StudyGPT is a powerful AI-powered study tool designed to help you to solve study prob
Knowee AI StudyGPT is a powerful AI-powered study tool designed to help you to solve study problem.
Knowee AI StudyGPT is a powerful AI-powered study tool designed to help you to solve study problem.
Knowee AI StudyGPT is a powerful AI-powered study tool designed to help you to solve study problem.
Knowee AI StudyGPT is a powerful AI-powered study tool designed to help you to solv
Similar Questions
Let (xn) be a bounded sequence in R. Show that there exist subsequences (xnk ) and(xmk ) of (xn) such thatlimk→∞ xnk = lim sup xn and limk→∞ xmk = lim inf xn.
Let (xn)n≥1 and (yn)n≥1 be bounded sequence. Prove thatlim infn→∞ (xn + yn) ≥ lim infn→∞ xn + lim infn→∞ yn
Let A and B be non-empty bounded subsets of R. DefineA − B := {a − b : a ∈ A, b ∈ B}.Prove thatsup(A − B) = sup A − inf B
Let A and B be non-empty bounded subsets of R. DefineA − B := {a − b : a ∈ A, b ∈ B} .Prove thatinf(A − B) = inf A − sup B
If (xn) is a bounded sequence in R then the following statements about a numberx∗ ∈ R are equivalent