Courts of general jurisdiction typically have a judge and jury. a judge only. a jury only. a panel of judges.
Question
Courts of general jurisdiction typically
- have a judge and jury.
- a judge only.
- a jury only.
- a panel of judges.
Solution
Step 1: Define the Problem
Identify the typical composition of courts of general jurisdiction.
Step 2: Break Down the Problem
Examine each option to determine which accurately describes the typical setup of courts of general jurisdiction.
Step 3: Apply Relevant Concepts
Courts of general jurisdiction handle a wide range of cases and typically involve both a judge and a jury for trials, especially in criminal and civil cases.
Step 4: Analysis, Verify and Summarize
- A judge and jury: Common in courts of general jurisdiction for trials.
- A judge only: More typical in appellate or specialized courts.
- A jury only: Not applicable, as a judge is needed to oversee legal proceedings.
- A panel of judges: Usually found in appellate courts, not general jurisdiction.
Final Answer
Courts of general jurisdiction typically have a judge and jury.
Similar Questions
Explain the difference between a court of original jurisdiction and appellate jurisdiction.
A person who take as proceedings against the accused on the behalf of the state is the __________.A.judgeB.lawyerC.plantiffD.prosecutor
___________ are there only to determine matters of law did the trial court conduct its proceedings fairly and correctly.
What type of courts hear appeals?Group of answer choicesappellate courtstraffic courtsthe peoples courtcourt’s geographical location
______ law is composed of judges’ legal opinions that reflect community practices and evolve over time.Group of answer choicesCommonMandatoryCivilSovereign
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.